djgolfcan;407016 wroteNext thing, don't buy in for only $100. That's only 30BBs - one bad beat and its all gone. Even the regs at Casino Niagara will stack off with top pair, top kicker, you need to have enough to take advantage of that.
If you're just going to have fun, then by all means, but if you're going to make money, buy in for the max.
$100 is most reasonable for me financially and most comfortable for me being highly amateurally. I hear you 100% though, I had the same thought at this last session. Buying in for the max would be ideal and in many ways could be "more comfortable" than the min.. It can be scary and depressing to think (or worse, experience) one little bad beat cuz of some noob bad move I made or worse, the infamous "I hit Top pair / Top kicker" and my opponent made a set (has happened to me before, sucks a lot and I have no clue how to sniff that out).
Richard~;407018 wrotePeople keep saying this as if it's a bad thing but top pair top kicker is often a very strong hand
Can you guys please flesh out this "debate" of it either being noobish to "stack off" with Top pair / Top kicker or it being smart to realize that it is a very strong holding and often you are right to consider it strong?
And Richard, can you flesh out your discourse on being put into "disgusting spots" and how that can be a reality of navigating a 1/3 game and interacting with fish, drunk people, and the stronger players? How do I make my home among this assortment of humanity, and become an effective player?
I've heard Tight / aggressive is nice against calling stations. Play premium hands. Make your hand. Bet and get paid. Last session I enjoyed being slightly loose / aggressive, but still playing well. In position, and aggressive seemed to work well for me. If I played only premium hands by best hand in two hours was J / 10 suited and my second best hand was K / J. (I guess I also got to middle pocket-pairs, which is nice too.)
One more hand from the session
I'm always terrible with describing a hand perfectly, but still looking for feedback. I was playing K / J, and heads up and in position. The flop came 10 / 10 / 4 rainbow. He checked and I bet. He called. On the turn, I made top pair, as a K came down. He now decided to lead with a bigger bet (like $34). I was immediately frozen with a big decision for my small, min buy-in stack. I gave him credit for possibly having a 10 in-hand. Is that smart? Or should I possibly have considered my two-pair strong? I mean, mathematically, it's pretty likely he wouldn't have a 10, but obv he still could have it.
I actually took enough time that someone called time (which doesn't take much since we're all antsy on the new $5 / half hour system). Within my last 10s of time, I mucked.
I asked him as I left, and he claimed he just had a pair, not the 10. I wonder if it was the 4, or maybe a K like me. Who knows. My friend, at the table with me, thought he showed weakness when I "bothered" him with my table talk. (I was asking him if he had the 10, lol. He would not reveal. He just got mildly bothered after a couple times, and my friend thought my talk had been effective in revealing weakness. Lol, let's just say I think Will Kassouf is cool.)
Thoughts? :D