JimmyHo;386132 wroteEven if its their own money, playing for a set number of hands will only lead to numerous all ins.
do you really think so? there are certain situations that may lead to a few people doing this, but i don't think it will be "as bad as" you think.
first of all, they still have to consider their total profits over all the rounds. for example, if there are 5 rounds and it's only round 2 or 3, i don't think the chance of numerous all ins will be a big issue.
now, if it's the last round and the player is very close to making the cut, they may play more aggressively and take some chances, but i don't think they'll just start pushing all in like mad. there will obviously be some sort of cut off. if they are down $300K overall for example, it may already be too late for them since they can only buy in for $100K and can only win as much based on the money in front of them.
also, the first place prize is $1 million, so at some point the player isn't going to keep risking money to win that prize. i mean, are they really going to risk $600K, $700K, $800K
just to have the chance to hopefully go on a huge upswing
just to have the chance to possibly win $1 million total on the final table? maybe some will be willing but i don't think it'll be as big an issue as you may think.
maybe i'm wrong though so i'd be interested in hearing
why you think this would happen.
also, i'm interested in why you think this would be a bad thing even if a few people did end up playing like this. i'm assuming it is bad because "it's not really playing properly" and therefore it is "not real poker" or something along those lines. maybe that is true, but that doesn't mean it's not entertaining for some. for example, i'm sure there are some people who enjoyed watching sahamies doing $200K flips against whoever just for the hell of it.