GTA Poker;372357 wroteI play the opposite of many tournament theorists in that I play lots of hands and make moves just like in a cash game.
Mike Caro hates tournaments because he thinks the best poker play becomes different from a cash game, but IMO, chip EV = $EV until close to the bubble or final table, e.g., a +EV bluff/call/raise in a cash game would also be +$EV for most of the tournament.
Inevitably, unless I run super well in the middle stages I end up with 20% on the field left with a 20bb average...usually vs many unknowns (and I unknown to them) as it seems that these days the tourney donks;)/players do not seep into the cash games much at all.
I think there are more choices for tournament players. For example, after I ran into a full house during WPT CSC, rather than play the cash game with $15 max rake/hand, I signed up for a SNG instead. At WPT Fallsview, there would be 3-4 SNG tables going, so after finishing one satellite, you see your name on the next satellite & don't bother playing a cash game.
To all the good/great MTT players on here how do you view this stage of the tournament? I tend to view tournaments as playing enough to get to this spot and then needing a bit of rungood to get a stack again...I really feel that you need to pick up some cards to win a MTT whereas I can consistently beat cash games making moves and making hands.
While the cash games you regularly play will have an M of >= 66 (or 100 BB) for many of the players, in tournaments, most players battling for the money will have an M < 20. It's like playing a 1/2 cash game, but even the biggest stack only has $60 left (instead of $200+) and there are a whole bunch of shorties with <= $18 left so your options are limited compared to everybody having at least $200.