Flopped_Nuts;357997 wrote80% of the time I'd bet the quads on the turn (probably 75% of pot). A check on the turn and a bet on the river may be giving away your hand just as much. Might as well bet the turn and hope to get the player to call or raise you based on the implied value of their hand. The implied value of their hand most likely will significantly decrease by the river because they may have missed their draw or the board may be even scarier for them, which means you won't be getting too much out of them anyway. In turn, depending on how aggressive the player is they may even be so bold as to raise you in an attempt to bluff that they hit a set or have filled up on the turn.
This is more aligned with the way I'm thinking about it now, after the fact.
Probably with live, people are more likely to call. They 'didn't come to fold' after investing time and effort to get there vs playing online. And they can't multi-table :) I call WB semi-live since we get almost double the hands per hour we would get with a dealer and chips.
The other part of check turn/bet river is I could be bluffing (ok, small possibility of that) and I have to bet to win, so I might get called by a decent hand.
My guess is he missed whatever he was drawing to and didn't want to fire on the river because he didn't think he could get me to fold a good hand. A check raise from him would have been foolhardy unless he had a bad read. I think he was a pretty good player and had sat with me long enough to have a good feel for my hand here.
With this particular hand, I doubt I get called on the turn anyway BUT as a general principal against this player (possibly all players), I agree, it was probably better to bet the turn.