Oh man....
Imma gonna read that article through, but I get this sneaking suspicion that this is a "thought experiment" vs, you know, science.
Killing babies no different from abortion, experts say - Telegraph
I argued earlier that this would be the next step in the abortion fight. How long before is becomes law? I thought I read it was on dockets to become law, but time doesn't allow me to search. But it is coming.
So we have an article in the Telegraph. This just in, Fox news correspondents found to highly agree.
And for the record, when do you ever have an original thought?
Isn't that just the pope calling the grand mufti a sham!
How far back do you have to go in history where abortion was the unthinkable?
Was practiced in
Hamlet by Ophelia, some 400+ years ago... sure that's a work of fiction, but we've been accepting those so far in these conversations. Gonna throw a quote in from a great man who for real real exists;
Ophelia, she's 'neath the window,
for her I feel so afraid.
On her 22nd birthday,
she already is an old maid.
To her death is quite romantic,
she wears an iron vest.
Her profession is her religion,
her sin is her lifelessness
when do you ever have an original thought
He can pull the god card giving us our free will, or he can pull the philosophy card of no original thoughts!
Hey! A referenced article again! Twice in one thread?!?! :O Let's do some readin!!
Oh.. Huh...
Marc Thiessen?
A few of the choicer blurbs...
"served as a speechwriter for United States President George W. Bush (2004–2009)"
Hmm, well... people gotta put food on the table ya know?
"he argued that the enhanced interrogation techniques used by the CIA, which the Obama administration has characterized as torture,[2] are not torture by any reasonable legal or moral standard[3] and "were not only effective, but lawful and morally just:
Well, I wonder what the new testament says about waterboarding....
"six years (1995–2001) on Capitol Hill as spokesman and senior policy advisor to Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Jesse Helms"
Oh! Wonder what Jesse Helms was like?
"nickname, "Senator No".[7] He opposed, at various times, civil rights, disability rights, feminism, gay rights, affirmative action, abortion, and government support for contemporary art with graphic sexuality.[8] Helms brought an "aggressiveness"[9] to his conservatism, as in his rhetoric against homosexuality, and employed racially charged language in his campaigns and editorials"
Well, that seems, completely horrible actually. At least he was consistent? I mean, blacks, women, gays, minorities, women (again), art with sexuality (trifecta against women! History has shown that male sexuality is okay, but women's is instantly super censored). And he showcased all of this with good old racist and homophobic words? Nice. Wait, 25 years in senate?
Anyways, back to our buddy Marc.... Hey! He wrote a
whole book!!
"based on a series of slipshod premises."
"head of Scotland Yard's anti-terrorism branch in 2006 as saying that Thiessen's account of the Heathrow plot is "completely and utterly wrong" "
"Matthew Alexander, a former military interrogator and author of How to Break a Terrorist, characterises Thiessen's book as 'a literary defense of war criminals"
Well that all seems kinda like... crazy talk stuff doesn't it? Maybe this particular fella isn't someone to use to back your argument!
I bet WBC backs him up though...
#disguisethehate #godonourside #dylanstillhaditright #superioritythroughfairytales
Mark