jontm;357266 wroteI personally believe income levels affect the "luck factor" and profability of cash games to some degree. Obv, good table selection can reduce or increase this, but that isn't always an option, there are only a few going.
For my example, in Calgary I find people have far lower of a fear of loss and see a ton of super loose play. Great if your on good end, devastating if not. You need deep pockets and lots of plus EV situations that hold and time, cause its a roller coaster and there are some huge pots.
In Regina, games are much tighter, stealing pots is generally easy, but they aren't going to get big without the hell of the deck, outside a tournament series.
In Edmonton, play is generally deeper, but just a little less volatile than Calgary IMO. You have your young high rollers from the patch, still seems like a bit of a "smarter", less gamble or aggression game. I think it's the best of the 3.
Vegas is like Regina if you bum hunt rooms IMO, obv big rooms have action. Again, better or more expensive room with $$$, harder to eliminate luck (and skill).
Supporting Data:
1 Ottawa CMA 1,236,324 $94,700
2 Calgary CMA 1,214,839 $89,490
3 Edmonton CMA 1,159,869 $87,930
4 Regina CMA 210,556 $84,890
I found Calgary and Edmonton to be identical. The reason the games are so soft in AB is the economy. This is also the reason the games are more social and friendly. The majority of players aren't bitter and trying to grind a meager living at 1/2 NL...they are there to have fun playing cards.
I disagree with your statement of the Calgary games being a roller coaster ride (I haven't been there in 3-4 years but I hear the games are basically still the same), I find that they are fairly easy to beat.
I think you will get a much better comparison in comparing AB games to games in areas that were really affected by the recession -- California games or Vegas games. There is a huge difference in these areas vs. AB.
You are comparing apples to apples in your example. Come to California and get some oranges.