Making the case for atheism...can it be done?

DrTyore

luvs2fart;398642 wroteI'm almost certain you're the only one that thinks that.

I am definitely not arguing. I'd love to debate the god vs godless but we can't get off the ground.

He isn't the only one, it crossed my mind. However, considering last i heard fella had 20k debt on his head, even he ain't stupid enough to come outta his foxhole - and believe me, stupid was his thing.

Mark

Milo

Wow . . . one MORE thing Mark and I can agree on. Lets all hug it out . . . maybe go to a karaoke bar.

Whaddaya say, trigs? You get to pick the first song, and I'll sing. Just no Cher . . . I only bust that out during Pride Week.

sard1010

Glad you guys enjoyed the show. However, this is my own account and I don't have any other accounts with PokerForum.ca. I joined to talk poker, not religion, but I wanted to take a stab at it.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

trigs

the fact that neither of you were around when fed was here and neither of you were like "wtf? what is a fed?" makes me believe even more that you are both in fact fed.

compuease

trigs;398696 wrotethe fact that neither of you were around when fed was here and neither of you were like "wtf? what is a fed?" makes me believe even more that you are both in fact fed.

Nope... Stoney Creek, very unlikely feddy...

trigs

compuease;398697 wroteNope... Stoney Creek, very unlikely feddy...

okay. case closed.

luvs2fart

trigs;398696 wrotethe fact that neither of you were around when fed was here and neither of you were like "wtf? what is a fed?" makes me believe even more that you are both in fact fed.

I don't know who or what "fed" is and because I don't care I never bothered to question it.

someone wasn't around when another user was isn't much of a fact worth debating.

last year around this time someone didn't agree with my operating system choices so you or they floated around the idea that I was "haim" who also favored XP

So year one haim, next year fed. Given my connection to both people is
1). windows xp
2). wasn't around when he was

Give yourself some time to figure out the math. You probably have a .0000001% chance of being right.

trigs

fack it. i don't want to get into this.

luvs2fart

trigs;398705 wrotefack it. i don't want to get into this.

What is there to get in to ? You took a .000001% chance that I was someone I'm not and you missed. Then you edited your post to cut out the nonsense a few minutes after posting it. Of course I don't care or understand "fed" it could be an object, a person, an idea, the govt .. Did you really expect me to understand what goes in your head when you say "fed".

You might want to have your head examined if you always think someone is someone else and they're a douche when it doesn't pan out. It is a bit on the delusional and paranoid side. Thanks for editing all that stuff, makes you look even worse now that you don't support your own hypothesis.

DrTyore

luvs2fart;398707 wroteWhat is there to get in to ? You took a .000001% chance that I was someone I'm not and you missed. Then you edited your post to cut out the nonsense a few minutes after posting it. Of course I don't care or understand "fed" it could be an object, a person, an idea, the govt .. Did you really expect me to understand what goes in your head when you say "fed".

You might want to have your head examined if you always think someone is someone else and they're a douche when it doesn't pan out. It is a bit on the delusional and paranoid side. Thanks for editing all that stuff, makes you look even worse now that you don't support your own hypothesis.

Pump the brakes there friend.. Fed was an old user around here that trolled the forum for over a year (among some others). His MO was to come back under new aliases and play dumb for a few weeks, but then his ego would kick in and he couldn't help but furiously masturbate over how he "got" us.

Trigs is - well I can't say a respected member - but a long term member here. You're new. Call it an unfortunate misunderstanding, buy one another a beer and forget it.

Mark

trigs

luvs2fart;398707 wroteWhat is there to get in to ? You took a .000001% chance that I was someone I'm not and you missed. Then you edited your post to cut out the nonsense a few minutes after posting it. Of course I don't care or understand "fed" it could be an object, a person, an idea, the govt .. Did you really expect me to understand what goes in your head when you say "fed".

You might want to have your head examined if you always think someone is someone else and they're a douche when it doesn't pan out. It is a bit on the delusional and paranoid side. Thanks for editing all that stuff, makes you look even worse now that you don't support your own hypothesis.

calm blue ocean.

serenity now.

trigs

DrTyore;398708 wroteTrigs is - well I can't say a respected member - but a long term member here.

FU DrTyore!

:D

EDIT: i will have you know that comp vouched for me once!

EDIT 2: who am i kidding? i get no respect from anyone :(

luvs2fart

DrTyore;398708 wrotePump the brakes there friend.. Fed was an old user around here that trolled the forum for over a year (among some others). His MO was to come back under new aliases and play dumb for a few weeks, but then his ego would kick in and he couldn't help but furiously masturbate over how he "got" us.

Mark

Sorry to hear that but that isn't my style. I already concluded last year that there was no itelligent life in this forum so I wouldn't bother to prove myself or any point I make beyond what is reasonable and that would include coming back as a new user.

given that fact, posting since last year would not qualify me as a new member. I read the posts here all the time but I just don't reply much because pokerforum.ca is a largely a "forum of 3" . And when I do reply I actually try to make a point or reference unlike the other 3.

DrTyore

luvs2fart;398712 wroteSorry to hear that but that isn't my style. I already concluded last year that there was no itelligent life in this forum so I wouldn't bother to prove myself or any point I make beyond what is reasonable and that would include coming back as a new user.

given that fact, posting since last year would not qualify me as a new member. I read the posts here all the time but I just don't reply much because pokerforum.ca is a largely a "forum of 3" . And when I do reply I actually try to make a point or reference unlike the other 3.

Alternatively then, stick to being a cock... enjoy your stay.

Mark

trigs

luvs2fart;398712 wroteSorry to hear that but that isn't my style. I already concluded last year that there was no itelligent life in this forum so I wouldn't bother to prove myself or any point I make beyond what is reasonable and that would include coming back as a new user.

given that fact, posting since last year would not qualify me as a new member. I read the posts here all the time but I just don't reply much because pokerforum.ca is a largely a "forum of 3" . And when I do reply I actually try to make a point or reference unlike the other 3.

i think i retract my former retraction. cheers.

EDIT: fuck me. you got me now. who are the three?

compuease

Sitting idly by.. just waiting for appropriate moment...

Fed's brother? I dunno, isn't this the poker discussion thread?

MickeyHoldem

is there a poker discussion thread?

sard1010

trigs;398709 wrotecalm blue ocean.

serenity now.

Well done. I have much to learn from you.

luvs2fart

It seems to me that god has left this thread along with our universe and nobody was able to step up to the plate and bat for him.

god damn it I declare this thread closed

PS: the co -author of the bible was attached

[ATTACH=CONFIG]2158[/ATTACH]

The Prophet 22

luvs2fart;398853 wrote I declare this thread closed

Not yours to declare now is it.

Prophet22

« Previous Page Next Page »