JohnnieH;343233 wroteI still don't understand the vetting period. Just get the damn rosters finished and we can vet each others lists after you post them.
I do everything as in previous years, including posting the teams . . . the difference is this time each manager gets to look over all of the rosters for questionable selections BEFORE the Pool begins, so that everyone is satisfied, and hopefully fewer arguments occur.
wildbill7145;343234 wroteSounds good Milo. I like Johnnie's idea of 20 on a team. Just means we're all going to have to be a little more vigilant in checking our lists regularly. Hope that's not a problem.
Still not sure what you're getting at with this . . . If we get 16 players per squad by the time one manager's roster is used up, how do you propose we add four more players?