Well we finally had to take this PoS back.

djgolfcan

darbday;333038 wrotebut you have to raise your intelligence to a level where you realize you are not smart enough to determine such a thing.

If I personally hear someone state that they want a group of people (that I belong to), dead, then I am smart enough to determine that I should not hang around that person.

[deleted]

What if your group pissed on the other groups families dead bodies?

deleted video as I find it offensive, may have actually happened but this is not the place..

djgolfcan

darbday;333040 wroteWhat if its its a women and you and your group are raping her?

I wouldn't be part of that group.

[deleted]

djgolfcan;333042 wroteI wouldn't be part of that group.

you are Canadian right?

djgolfcan

darbday;333043 wroteyou are Canadian right?

We have laws against that sort of thing. Not all Canadians rape Muslims. We would deal harshly with anyone we knew that would do this.

It is unfortunate that their society doesn't feel the same about the extreme terrorists and their actions. If they persecuted them, the way we persecute our criminals, there wouldn't be an issue.

[deleted]

djgolfcan;333044 wroteWe have laws against that sort of thing. Not all Canadians rape Muslims. We would deal harshly with anyone we knew that would do this.

It is unfortunate that their society doesn't feel the same about the extreme terrorists and their actions. If they persecuted them, the way we persecute our criminals, there wouldn't be an issue.

I encourage not to vote as you don't have the intelligence to make a proper decision, you still think that poker is fucking you with bad beats (you don't stop to question your game and try to improve it).

Your definition of terrorist doesn't exist. A 'terrorist' is someone who goes against your countries ideals. For example, Americans piss on dead bodies, kill families children, and slaughter masses. They enter countries under their own laws and violently take over.

The people who disagree and fight back are labeled terrorists, and idiots who fall for that scam subscribe to this.

There are many people suffering this world, and you all have chosen to hate them and ignore them, and hate them when they hate you for your ignorance.

[deleted]

So the wrong-doer cannot do wrong without the hidden will of you all.
Like a procession you walk together towards your god-self.
You are the way and the wayfarers.
And when one of you falls down he falls for those behind him, a caution against the stumbling stone.
Ay, and he falls for those ahead of him, who though faster and surer of foot, yet removed not the stumbling stone.
And this also, though the word lie heavy upon your hearts:
The murdered is not unaccountable for his own murder,
And the robbed is not blameless in being robbed.
The righteous is not innocent of the deeds of the wicked,
And the white-handed is not clean in the doings of the felon.

Or do i not understand this?

http://4umi.com/gibran/prophet/12

djgolfcan

darbday;333045 wroteI encourage not to vote as you don't have the intelligence to make a proper decision, you still think that poker is fucking you with bad beats (you don't stop to question your game and try to improve it).

That's what I thought, you egotistical little troll. Not once did I make a derrogatory remark about your intelligence (or lack their of). I thought we were having a civilized debate.

I can see now, that for all your words, you are not open to new ideas or even entertaining the thought that your view may be wrong or scewed.

Because I make posts in a bad beat forum does not mean I am not trying to improve my game. By resorting to name calling, or making assumptions about me, you have told me all I need to know about you.

Go smoke another one.

G'bye Darbday.

[deleted]

i think that, i'm of course opposed to terror or any rational person is but I think that if we're serious about the question of terror serious about the question of violence, we have to recognize that it is a tactical and hence moral matter. incidentally, tactical issues are basically moral issues. they have to do with human consequences and if we're interested in let's say diminishing the amount of violence in the world, it's at least arguable and perhaps even sometimes true that a terroristic act does diminish the amount of violence in the world. hence a person who is opposed to violence will not be opposed to that terroristic act.

or i didn't understand this maybe? (Noam Chomsky)

[deleted]

djgolfcan;333049 wroteThat's what I thought, you egotistical little troll. Not once did I make a derrogatory remark about your intelligence (or lack their of). I thought we were having a civilized debate.

No this isn't a civilizied debate. You are deciding a childs fate based on war crimes caused by YOUR ignorance. Thinking you have a right to comment and judge him is stupid, I'm accusing anyone here that is judging, of being stupid.

I can see now, that for all your words, you are not open to new ideas or even entertaining the thought that your view may be wrong or scewed.

You are trying to convince me that a 16 year old child is liable for war crimes, vs a facist country/army. Also I never claimed i was capable of changing my mind.

Because I make posts in a bad beat forum does not mean I am not trying to improve my game.

I wasn't suggesting you were trying to improve, i was pointing out the lunacy of constantly complaing and sinking money into a game of skill you refuse to improve at.

By resorting to name calling, or making assumptions about me, you have told me all I need to know about you.

I did no such thing.

Go smoke another one.

Again weed is a positive thing, not negative...you were lied too. ( this stoner is playing 24 tables while typing this)

G'bye Darbday.

:-\
was actually hopin to see you in the strat section.

trigs

honestly darb, for all your rhetoric you really come off as very dogmatic which seems to be the exact opposite of what you preach.

djgolfcan

trigs;333052 wrotehonestly darb, for all your rhetoric you really come off as very dogmatic which seems to be the exact opposite of what you preach.

Fortunately, I no longer have to read his ramblings.

[deleted]

trigs;333052 wrotehonestly darb, for all your rhetoric you really come off as very dogmatic which seems to be the exact opposite of what you preach.

Preaching can't be undogmatic.

Charging a child for war crimes is being a biggot.

believing they shouldn't be charged is a natural thought from a mind that doesn't believe in things like nationalism.

and you know what, you agree with me, but you can't stop making me your enemy.

you actually like people with my set of morals.

[deleted]

djgolfcan;333053 wroteFortunately, I no longer have to read his ramblings.

unfortunetly he'll miss our strat talk, and he will continue to post bad beats.

trigs

djgolfcan;333053 wroteFortunately, I no longer have to read his ramblings.

for the most part, i really don't care about his points being offensive. he's entitled to be a dick if he wants. what bothers me is the lack of an open mind. i'd probably be okay if he at least pretended that other opinions count and could be valid, and that the ideas he espouse to are not the be all and end all for everyone. i'd be bothered even less if he realized the irony between his actions and his ramblings.

trigs

darbday;333054 wrotePreaching can't be undogmatic.

agreed. so stop preaching. very rarely is it a good thing.

Charging a child for war crimes is being a biggot.

believing they shouldn't be charged is a natural thought from a mind that doesn't believe in things like nationalism.

i was not and am not commenting on the specifics of this thread.

and you know what, you agree with me, but you can't stop making me your enemy.

you actually like people with my set of morals.

me disagreeing with your approach is not me making you my enemy. if you think that then i'm sorry for you. and yes, i do agree with some of the stuff you say. i don't agree with your delivery in the slightest, nor do i agree with some of the ways you view our world as a whole. you seem to see some stark dichotomy in the 'truth' vs the 'lies' and i'd suggest that that isn't the best way to voice your opinion if you want people to listen to you and take you seriously.

[deleted]

trigs;333056 wrotefor the most part, i really don't care about his points being offensive. he's entitled to be a dick if he wants. what bothers me is the lack of an open mind. i'd probably be okay if he at least pretended that other opinions count and could be valid, and that the ideas he espouse to are not the be all and end all for everyone. i'd be bothered even less if he realized the irony between his actions and his ramblings.

Yes for example, you think there should be a vote on whether blacks are humans too, because that is democracy, everyone should get a say right?

but i don't think we should get to have an opinion on such a thing...i think its sick.

trigs

darbday;333058 wroteYes for example, you think there should be a vote on whether blacks are humans too, because that is democracy, everyone should get a say right?

but i don't think we should get to have an opinion on such a thing...i think its sick.

umm...wtf?

and we don't have a democracy. we just call it that nowadays.

[deleted]

trigs;333059 wroteumm...wtf?

and we don't have a democracy. we just call it that nowadays.

exactly and the people who want it back should not be labeled terrorists.

trigs

darbday;333060 wroteexactly and the people who want it back should not be labeled terrorists.

i completely agree that they shouldn't be called terrorists (at least they don't deserve it more than others), however, the 'democracy' they want is the same one we have at the present time. i really should put quotation marks around that term when i use it.

EDIT: people have many added characteristics to the terms 'terrorist' and 'terrorism' but the straightforward dictionary definition states it best:

Definition of TERRORISM

: the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion

a lot of people and countries fit that definition

« Previous Page Next Page »