literation;321463 wroteThanks this is helping me. The topics from today are blending for me now because I recall a large way I approached chess was, whoever makes the biggest mistake loses or whoever makes too many small mistakes loses.
Ya your gonna really dig my next vid on what a mistake is. I mean we all know what a mistake is but I think I can show it in a way many players don't pick up on. And its certainly mathematical so we will be able to see how a computer picks it up and adjusts to opponents mistakes.
I can't get the replayer to work but if I figure it out I'll do it tonight.
To me, this doesn't mean play passive or only defend but some attacks need to be recalled or in some pots on some streets not 1 more chip should be put into the middle.
yes
In the video, I didn't see any mistake in analysis - not even sure I could spot a mistake yet - but the timing is 43:00 That's an easy entry point. At 43:23 EVDiff% -0.03 appears so while the video was interesting this part made me pause and think about the effect of even small errors.
Ah yes I didn't realize it was a calling example (but it doesn't matter).
If it helps to say this too, we can 'undercall' as well, which means we miss +ev spots.
For example: say we fold KJo (but we would call with KQ or better)
If nash says we are supposed to call with JT or better.....well then we miss every +ev hand from JT-KJ.
So folding KJ is a small mistake but it represents folding every worse hand because won't fold with KJ but call QT.
Warning: I haven't really bounced this off a high level player that 'knows' but I think once you get what I'm trying to say its self explanatory....but in my opinion a persons concept of shoving/calling goes through the roof.