DennisG;309441 wroteI just can't seem to get on the good side of variance ( I have forgotten about all my suckouts) and cash decently in anything.
:-X
DennisG;309441 wrote I have a really bad time at *'s having only ever won one tournament there, and feel like I can't ever get anywhere on that site..which in turn leads me to play worse and compounding the problem.
I have read and heard that stars is the tougher site out there. And yes not 'knowing' the correct answer in a hand + variance leads me, and has lead many others to create their own poker 'religions'. Variance a terrible thing for this (also having a small sample messes with this)
DennisG;309441 wrote
I have been playing at the other sites I have done well at in the past few years, but seem to be lacking something still...probably patience..ok, I know it's patience..lol
I think lack of patience still implies that we are unsure in certain spots... or in other words, there is no time ;P
DennisG;309441 wroteI know it shouldn't bother me, and it has zero to do with bankroll issues...I don't use one, never have, and don't care about the 16 bucks the tourney cost
This is the part I wanted to respond to, I think this sentence contradicts trying to increase one's roi. Not sure if I'm talking mathematically or philosophically but I think its a hidden truth
Its like if you have no thoughts on brmg your concept of poker is in the air. When you think in terms of bankroll a lot of different things become defined.
I came across this thinking from something V said slightly in jest (maybe it wasn't in jest).
DennisG;309441 wroteBefore I do anything rash though...I am gonna head to Darb's place and watch him play for a few hours..maybe get a new outlook..lol...If I can keep my head out of the smoke!! lol
getting a new outlook at darb's seems kinda rash tho