darbday;277198 wroteyes i do ....but you said running good is imperitive to positive results.... over a large sample size i don't think thats true at all....in fact the larger the sample size the less 'run good' matters......but i just think its important to squish that thought when dealing with a novice inquirer.....meaning if your not winning its because you are not good enough....which maybe we could argue over but its important to emphasize to novice players....
i also know what unexploitable shoves are.... :mad:
I think you 2 are arguing the same point.
5 turbos of perfect poker playing could leave thinking you're Phil Ivey (or better yet philli), or Mike Matusow, or most likely somewhere in between.
5000 turbos of perfect poker should have you marginally ahead of the game.......degrees of rungood and even more importantly "timing" of said rungood, is ultimately what makes the big success stories. No offense to Vekked, Wetts and Pudge obv.