iNano78;254870 wroteIf you were planning to fold to a single bet on a dry flop, why did you raise pre-flop? Seems like you were set-mining. Might as well just call pre-flop then.
Knowing what villain had, it was a good lay down. But villain could also have had TT, 99, 88, A7, maybe 56s (depends if villain would raise pre and call a 3-bet with small suited connectors), AK, AQ, and maybe others that you're ahead of. Sure, AA, KK, and QQ each beat you, as do 77, 44, and 22 (all less likely, as most players would check to the aggressor after flopping a set)... and if that is everything in villain's range (calling a 3-bet and leading on a dry flop), then it's a good fold.
P.S. I also hate JJ, but I'm just not convinced I like the "3-bet pre-flop and fold to a single out-of-position bet on a 7-high flop" line all that much.
Thanks for the great input..
By three betting PF here, I thought it would give me a better idea of where my hand stood. If I just call his bet PF, what do I do after he bets out after the dry flop?
(Silly question here: In this example, what is the real difference here between villian 4 betting PF or his C-Bet post Flop? The reason I ask is because my result would be identical, no?)
I forgot to mention that it was fairly early in the session, villian's stack was about $260.00 and I had about $340.00.
Cheers