PokerForum.ca Suggestions

12346

Comments

  • Well, rim had a different meaning back then GTA. It was at the end of the debauchery known as the 80's. Cocaine weekends and key parties. I personally had nothing to do with it, but I heard some incredible stories.

    Looking up 256k, EGA 16 colour images on your PC XT (comma man, the Apple IIe didn't support porn! It's wrong!) was tough with a 2400bps modem, but we all did what we could.

    I loved that Olympic game or whatever it was.
  • I could never get the modem to work...best I had was strip poker
  • GTA Poker wrote: »
    I could never get the modem to work...best I had was strip poker

    At the time, that was serious fun.
  • GTA Poker wrote: »
    Philli for president

    Bump
  • why can't we "like" our own posts? i think some of us need to stroke our own egos a bit.
  • trigs wrote: »
    why can't we "like" our own posts? i think some of us need to stroke our own egos a bit.

    Personally I would like an "unlike" even more... Of course I'm a crotchety old bastard..;)
  • trigs wrote: »
    why can't we "like" our own posts? i think some of us need to stroke our own egos a bit.
    compuease wrote: »
    Personally I would like an "unlike" even more... Of course I'm a crotchety old bastard..;)

    Why would you want to unlike your own posts? :D
  • I've sent out a couple PMs , and got nothing back, so I'm not sure if it's working or not?

    Anyone else ?

    If I'm being ignored because I'm a retard, disregard this post.

    Ty.
  • OHTNCTRHM wrote: »
    I'm being ignored because I'm a retard, disregard this post.

    Ty.

    Admitting it is the first step.

    Moving out of your parents' house is the next one.
  • GTA Poker wrote: »
    Admitting it is the first step.

    Moving out of your parents' house is the next one.

    Recently lnherited my own on the east coast, but ty
  • Hobbes wrote: »
    Why would you want to unlike your own posts? :D

    Peer pressure?
  • In Poker Forum Canada Statistics it says we have 500 Active Members. What is the
    definition of an Active Member ?

    When I was looking at the Current Active Users, ( I know it changes ), I noticed
    there were 43 ( 5 members and 38 guests ). Membership is Free. Has anyone ever
    asked themselves why aren't they all signing up ?

    Too many lookers!!!
  • In Poker Forum Canada Statistics it says we have 500 Active Members. What is the
    definition of an Active Member ?

    When I was looking at the Current Active Users, ( I know it changes ), I noticed
    there were 43 ( 5 members and 38 guests ). Membership is Free. Has anyone ever
    asked themselves why aren't they all signing up ?

    Too many lookers!!!

    what do you expect bill? afterall, people don't even take advantage of freerolls.
  • According to Vbulletin Manual:

    A member is considered 'active' if they have visited the board within the number of days specified in 'Active Members Time Cut-Off'.

    I'm not sure what our time cut off is.
  • According to Vbulletin Manual:

    A member is considered 'active' if they have visited the board within the number of days specified in 'Active Members Time Cut-Off'.

    I'm not sure what our time cut off is.

    really? they just visit? not sure if that should be considered active imo. active would suggest posting i'd think.
  • trigs wrote: »
    really? they just visit? not sure if that should be considered active imo. active would suggest posting i'd think.

    I'd agree with you to an extent, however there are lots of members who visit the forum regularly and private message other members about games, read threads, etc. They might not post much, but I don't think that means they aren't 'active' members of the community.

    Just my opinion and keep in mind it's simply a descriptor within the software to generate statistics. Not necessarily something that speaks to a qualitative description of a forum member.

    fk u triggs.
  • +1

    tapatalk puts this here to annoy YOU
  • god damn all of you (especially fed)!
  • According to Vbulletin Manual:

    A member is considered 'active' if they have visited the board within the number of days specified in 'Active Members Time Cut-Off'.

    I'm not sure what our time cut off is.
    Oh well, I was expecting a straight forward answer, like members posting within
    30 days or 60 days or something. I guess it couldn't be that simple.
  • Oh well, I was expecting a straight forward answer, like members posting within
    30 days or 60 days or something. I guess it couldn't be that simple.

    This is pretty much what you were asking for then, it just addresses logging in rather than posting. I've never seen a statistic mentioned on here regarding post counts. I might not have access to that info.
  • I'm going to need you to go ahead and start up a sub forum for completely insane posts. Mkay? Thanks.

    tapatalk puts this here to annoy YOU
  • I'm talking bat shit crazy y'know?

    tapatalk puts this here to annoy YOU
  • pkrfce9 wrote: »
    I'm talking bat shit crazy y'know?

    tapatalk puts this here to annoy YOU

    Oh, I know. But there's a secret to be revealed. Apparently.
  • Oh Greg, why don't you just tell us what happened last night at Brantford. I know
    everyone's dying to know.

    Any good hands, any bad beats ?
  • trigs wrote: »
    god damn all of you (especially fed)!

    idk who this fed guy is

    but F U frigs :frown:
  • We all know it's you, Kathy.
  • According to Vbulletin Manual:

    A member is considered 'active' if they have visited the board within the number of days specified in 'Active Members Time Cut-Off'.

    I'm not sure what our time cut off is.
    Do you mean that less than 500 members have visited the forum in a specified
    undefined period, like maybe 30 or 60 days ?

    How pathetic !!!

    Is anybody interested in fixing this ?

    I thought this was the NUMBER ONE POKER FORUM IN CANADA.
  • Oh, I know. But there's a secret to be revealed. Apparently.
    So, what's the secret ? We're all in suspense.
  • Do you mean that less than 500 members have visited the forum in a specified
    undefined period, like maybe 30 or 60 days ?

    How pathetic !!!

    Is anybody interested in fixing this ?

    I thought this was the NUMBER ONE POKER FORUM IN CANADA.

    Like I said Bill, I have no idea what the cutoff is. Could be a week for all I know, or like you said 30-60 days.
  • Do you mean that less than 500 members have visited the forum in a specified
    undefined period, like maybe 30 or 60 days ?

    How pathetic !!!

    Is anybody interested in fixing this ?

    I thought this was the NUMBER ONE POKER FORUM IN CANADA.

    This is the #1 poker forum in Canada..





    Like there is no #2...:(
This discussion has been closed.